The Hanoverian Soldiers
The
bridges and the accompanying road would once have seen the tramp of
many red coated British soldiers. Scotland about 1700 in some important
ways resembled some countries as they are found in the world today –
with parts of the society rapidly “modernising”; creating
new educational systems, adopting the new technologies and thoroughly
becoming part of the wider world, and other parts still living a much
older, tribal way of life. What happened has some parallels with what
we now see happening elsewhere.
Since the union of the crowns in 1603 and even more with
the union of parliaments in 1707, the clan societies of the border country
with England had abandoned their old raiding and lawless ways. In the
lowlands, a new society was developing that would take a leading role
in the enlightenment, the romantic movement, the industrial revolution
and, later, the development of the British Empire. In contrast, in the
Highlands, the clan system remained in intact with its Gaelic culture,
language, and martial organisation with men trained to arms from youth
and loyal to their clan chiefs. This divide was deepened through the
struggle between protestant, largely lowland Christians, who favoured
the ruling House of Hanover, and the Catholic or Episcopalian Highlanders
who supported the displaced House of Stuart. Supporters of the Stuart
cause were known as “Jacobites.”
In the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries,
there burst out of the Highlands a series of Jacobite rebellions in
support of the Stuarts. These threatened the Hanoverian monarchs and
their supporters. They were effectively suppressed but it became clear
to the Hanoverian governments of the United Kingdom that these rebellions,
coming from remoter and inaccessible areas of Scotland where it was
difficult to move troops, were a continuing menace. Action to control
the situation was therefore needed. After what proved to be the final
rebellion, in 1745/6, these actions included Acts of Parliament to enforce
the disarmament of the clansmen, and the suppression of culture such
as forbidding the playing of bagpipes or the wearing of tartan. They
also included the building of garrisoned fortresses from which control
could be exerted over the people.
General Wade arrived in Scotland in 1724 to survey the
effectiveness of measures taken so far, propose new ones, and report
to the government. He observed that there remained at least 12,000 well
armed Highlanders, most of whom were ready and willing to rise in rebellion
against the Hanoverian monarchs. Among his most important observations
was that the lack of roads and bridges in the Highlands made it particularly
difficult to control the situation. The effectiveness of garrisoned
strongholds was greatly decreased if there were no routes of communication
between them and the building of such routes was a major recommendation
of the report.
Wade was promptly appointed Commander in Chief Northern
Britain and set about putting his plans into action including the building
of several hundred miles of roads in the Highlands. Wade’s public
status was such that he had been commended in the original of the song,
later to be the new ‘British’ National Anthem.
Lord, grant that Marshal Wade,
May by thy mighty aid,
Victory bring.
May he sedition hush and like a torrent rush,
Rebellious Scots to crush,
God save the King.
Not since the days of the Roman empire in Britain had
such a road building programme been undertaken and it was undertaken
for the same reasons. These were military roads built for the suppression
of a local population. The chief builders were to be soldiers.
Wade arranged for them to be paid double wages while on
road building work, an extra 6p a day – a significant achievement
in itself! His military working parties each consisted of 1 captain,
2 subalterns, 2 sergeants, 2 corporals, 1 drummer, and 100 men and he
used about 500 men on any one road during a working season lasting from
April until 31 October. He used skilled craftsmen such as masons, smiths
and carpenters to build bridges and other structures. The roads were
sixteen feet wide (4.88 meters), a revolutionary width in 18th century
Britain, built on a foundation of large stones with layers of smaller
ones above, finishing with gravel surfaces. Like Roman military roads,
they were built in a straight line, going straight up slopes unless
they were too steep, when they were made into traverses or zigzags.
They were well drained with cross and side drains. There were soldiers
camps every ten miles and inns, called Kingshouses, often developed
alongside them. Some of these survive until this day.
In 1740, after building about 300 miles (483 kilometres)
of military roads, Wade left Scotland, later becoming a Field Marshall,
and was succeeded in his work by Major Caulfeild, who built many more
miles of military road than Wade – over 800 (1,287.5 kilometres)
miles in fact. Construction methods improved, such as the use of trained
engineers to map out and plan the entire route of a road in great detail.
He used larger working parties than Wade and expected road construction
to progress at the rate of 1.5 yards (1.37 meters) of road laid per
man per day.
The Building of the Military Bridges Near Cockbridge
It
was decided that a military road was needed to connect the important
towns of Dundee and Perth, and the garrison at Blairgowrie, in the south
with the large military fort of Fort George at Inverness, a distance
of over one hundred miles! Work on the southern sections began by 1748,
but it was not until 1753 and 1754 that the section containing our three
bridges was undertaken. In 1754 about 700 men were working on the section
leading from Braemar to Corgarff castle a short distance beyond the
most northerly bridge. The largest and most dramatic of the river crossings
in this section of road is the Old Invercauld Bridge, built in 1753
by Major Caulfeild to link Blairgowrie with Corgarff, superseded in
1859 by a new bridge provided by Prince Albert. Caulfeild’s masterpiece
is often considered to be the Old Spey Bridge at Grantown on Spey.
What Were the Effects of the Military Roads and How Were
they Received by the Highlanders?
Major Caulfeild finally died in 1767 and with his death
the road building programme ceased.
Highlanders showed a mix of apathy and outright hostility
to the roads. They were after all the creation of an alien government
imposing its rule upon them. They allowed government forces to move
around the Highlands more freely than ever before, as they were intended
to do. Highlanders, who had moved with ease among the Highlands on foot
before the roads saw little benefit from them and saw only benefits
for the “invaders.”
As the 18th century moved to its end and the 19th began
the threat of Jacobite rebellions became remote, but the military roads
still had to be maintained at very considerable cost. Also, the steepness
of parts of the military roads made them unsuitable for the stage coaches
that became an important form of public transport. Central government
grew ever more reluctant to meet this annual bill of several hundred
pounds and the Commissioners of Highland Roads and Bridges sought to
reduce the cost. Some little used roads were simply abandoned, others
that had become widely adopted for civilian use were transferred to
local government to maintain.
Finally, in 1862, the Commissioners submitted their final
report in which they noted with satisfaction how the military roads
had been important in bringing prosperity, trade, and peace to the Highlands.
But others have different views. Commenting on the self congratulatory
manner of that final report, Taylor states “Their criterion was
the annual amount paid in tax to the national exchequer. They appear
to have been totally unaware that the outward prosperity of these years
was punctuated by the Clearances, and by the slow death of a language,
a culture and a way of life ---.” He believes that the military
roads made little economic impact on the Highlands until the 19th century
when they became part of a wider system of communications in Scotland
that included roads and canals by the great civil engineer Telford and
were a major cause of the destruction of traditional highland life and
culture.
Need such impacts between the modern globalising world
and surviving traditional cultures of remote areas, such as continues
to occur in the world today, always be so destructive?
