The Hanoverian Soldiers
The
bridges and the accompanying road would once have seen the tramp of many red
coated British soldiers. Scotland about 1700 in some important ways resembled
some countries as they are found in the world today – with parts of the
society rapidly “modernising”; creating new educational systems, adopting the
new technologies and thoroughly becoming part of the wider world, and other
parts still living a much older, tribal way of life. What happened has some
parallels with what we now see happening elsewhere.
Since the union of the crowns in 1603 and
even more with the union of parliaments in 1707, the clan societies of the
border country with England had abandoned their old raiding and lawless ways.
In the lowlands, a new society was developing that would take a leading role
in the enlightenment, the romantic movement, the industrial revolution and,
later, the development of the British Empire. In contrast, in the Highlands,
the clan system remained in intact with its Gaelic culture, language, and
martial organisation with men trained to arms from youth and loyal to their
clan chiefs. This divide was deepened through the struggle between
protestant, largely lowland Christians, who favoured the ruling House of
Hanover, and the Catholic or Episcopalian Highlanders who supported the
displaced House of Stuart. Supporters of the Stuart cause were known as “Jacobites.”
In the late seventeenth and early eighteenth
centuries, there burst out of the Highlands a series of Jacobite rebellions
in support of the Stuarts. These threatened the Hanoverian monarchs and their
supporters. They were effectively suppressed but it became clear to the
Hanoverian governments of the United Kingdom that these rebellions, coming
from remoter and inaccessible areas of Scotland where it was difficult to
move troops, were a continuing menace. Action to control the situation was
therefore needed. After what proved to be the final rebellion, in 1745/6,
these actions included Acts of Parliament to enforce the disarmament of the
clansmen, and the suppression of culture such as forbidding the playing of
bagpipes or the wearing of tartan. They also included the building of
garrisoned fortresses from which control could be exerted over the people.
General Wade arrived in Scotland in 1724 to
survey the effectiveness of measures taken so far, propose new ones, and
report to the government. He observed that there remained at least 12,000
well armed Highlanders, most of whom were ready and willing to rise in
rebellion against the Hanoverian monarchs. Among his most important
observations was that the lack of roads and bridges in the Highlands made it
particularly difficult to control the situation. The effectiveness of
garrisoned strongholds was greatly decreased if there were no routes of
communication between them and the building of such routes was a major
recommendation of the report.
Wade was promptly appointed Commander in
Chief Northern Britain and set about putting his plans into action including
the building of several hundred miles of roads in the Highlands. Wade’s
public status was such that he had been commended in the original of the
song, later to be the new ‘British’ National Anthem.
Lord, grant that Marshal Wade,
May by thy mighty aid,
Victory bring.
May he sedition hush and like a torrent rush,
Rebellious Scots to crush,
God save the King.
Not since the days of the Roman empire in
Britain had such a road building programme been undertaken and it was
undertaken for the same reasons. These were military roads built for the
suppression of a local population. The chief builders were to be soldiers.
Wade arranged for them to be paid double
wages while on road building work, an extra 6p a day – a significant
achievement in itself! His military working parties each consisted of 1
captain, 2 subalterns, 2 sergeants, 2 corporals, 1 drummer, and 100 men and
he used about 500 men on any one road during a working season lasting from
April until 31 October. He used skilled craftsmen such as masons, smiths and
carpenters to build bridges and other structures. The roads were sixteen feet
wide (4.88 meters), a revolutionary width in 18th century Britain, built on a
foundation of large stones with layers of smaller ones above, finishing with
gravel surfaces. Like Roman military roads, they were built in a straight
line, going straight up slopes unless they were too steep, when they were
made into traverses or zigzags. They were well drained with cross and side
drains. There were soldiers camps every ten miles and inns, called
Kingshouses, often developed alongside them. Some of these survive until this
day.
In 1740, after building about 300 miles (483
kilometres) of military roads, Wade left Scotland, later becoming a Field
Marshall, and was succeeded in his work by Major Caulfeild, who built many
more miles of military road than Wade – over 800 (1,287.5 kilometres) miles
in fact. Construction methods improved, such as the use of trained engineers
to map out and plan the entire route of a road in great detail. He used
larger working parties than Wade and expected road construction to progress
at the rate of 1.5 yards (1.37 meters) of road laid per man per day.
The Building of the Military Bridges Near Cockbridge
It
was decided that a military road was needed to connect the important towns of
Dundee and Perth, and the garrison at Blairgowrie, in the south with the
large military fort of Fort George at Inverness, a distance of over one
hundred miles! Work on the southern sections began by 1748, but it was not
until 1753 and 1754 that the section containing our three bridges was
undertaken. In 1754 about 700 men were working on the section leading from
Braemar to Corgarff castle a short distance beyond the most northerly bridge.
The largest and most dramatic of the river crossings in this section of road
is the Old Invercauld Bridge, built in 1753 by Major Caulfeild to link
Blairgowrie with Corgarff, superseded in 1859 by a new bridge provided by
Prince Albert. Caulfeild’s masterpiece is often considered to be the Old Spey
Bridge at Grantown on Spey.
What Were the Effects of the Military Roads and How Were they
Received by the Highlanders?
Major Caulfeild finally died in 1767 and with
his death the road building programme ceased.
Highlanders showed a mix of apathy and
outright hostility to the roads. They were after all the creation of an alien
government imposing its rule upon them. They allowed government forces to
move around the Highlands more freely than ever before, as they were intended
to do. Highlanders, who had moved with ease among the Highlands on foot
before the roads saw little benefit from them and saw only benefits for the
“invaders.”
As the 18th century moved to its end and the
19th began the threat of Jacobite rebellions became remote, but the military
roads still had to be maintained at very considerable cost. Also, the
steepness of parts of the military roads made them unsuitable for the stage
coaches that became an important form of public transport. Central government
grew ever more reluctant to meet this annual bill of several hundred pounds
and the Commissioners of Highland Roads and Bridges sought to reduce the
cost. Some little used roads were simply abandoned, others that had become
widely adopted for civilian use were transferred to local government to
maintain.
Finally, in 1862, the Commissioners submitted
their final report in which they noted with satisfaction how the military
roads had been important in bringing prosperity, trade, and peace to the
Highlands. But others have different views. Commenting on the self
congratulatory manner of that final report, Taylor states “Their criterion
was the annual amount paid in tax to the national exchequer. They appear to
have been totally unaware that the outward prosperity of these years was
punctuated by the Clearances, and by the slow death of a language, a culture
and a way of life ---.” He believes that the military roads made little
economic impact on the Highlands until the 19th century when they became part
of a wider system of communications in Scotland that included roads and
canals by the great civil engineer Telford and were a major cause of the
destruction of traditional highland life and culture.
Need such impacts between the modern
globalising world and surviving traditional cultures of remote areas, such as
continues to occur in the world today, always be so destructive?
